One
of the problems faced by deacons in the modern world is that their
function has been taken over by the state. The modern social
welfare state gives cradle to grave security for its citizens. As
a result deacons have been left with nothing to do but care for
the buildings, and pay the minister.
The state has been quite wrong to take over this
responsibility. The Bible says that God has given the civil
government responsibility for administering justice (Romans
13:1-7). When the state moves beyond this and becomes a social
welfare agency, it is going beyond what God allows. It is taking a
responsibility that belongs to the family. God has given the role
of provider to the father of the family. And where the family
fails to provide, the church is responsible to meet the need.
A second problem is that governments are very inefficient in
providing social welfare. In many nations, the civil
government is spending a high proportion of the Gross Domestic
Product on social welfare. But even though they often spend more
than a quarter of all that is produced, they have not been able to
get rid of poverty. In fact it seems that poverty is getting
worse.
The reason is that government funds are administered by a
bureaucracy. Most of the money does not get to the poor. It goes
to pay the salaries of those who administer the social welfare
programmes. And because the programmes are impersonal, it is
impossible to distinguish between the bludgers and those with a
genuine need. Worse still, government programmes tend to produce a
class of people who are dependent on social welfare. They tend to
perpetuate the problem, rather than solving it.
Deacons would do the job much more efficiently. They would
usually be unpaid volunteers, so all the money would go to those
who are in need. They would have personal contact with those that
they are helping, so they could quickly weed out those who were
bludging. The money would go to those with genuine needs. But most
important of all, they would teach those who are poor to manage
without help. This would mean that monetary help would always be
given on a short-term basis.
A third problem with government social welfare schemes is the
effect that they have on family life. God has given fathers the
responsibility for providing for their families. When the state
becomes the provider, it takes away the responsibility of the
father, and he loses his self respect. This weakens family life,
making the whole welfare problem worse.
The worst effect of government social welfare is the effect
that it has on the incentive to work and succeed. People no longer
have to work to supply their needs, because the government will
provide for them. Those who do work are taxed heavily, to pay the
cost of social welfare. They soon get the feeling that it does not
pay to work hard. The result is that the whole economy is
weakened.
This is what has happened in many countries. More and more
people are depending on benefits from the welfare state, while
fewer and fewer people are working to support it. The whole system
is already strained, and will eventually collapse. When this
happens the deacons will have to go back to work. Once the state
can no longer provide for the poor, the church must take up its
proper responsibility. This will be a tremendous opportunity.
There will be many people in need. Deacons should be getting
ready, so that they can meet the need, and share the gospel at the
same time.
As the Churches begin to practise true community living, there
will be a tremendous release of resources. Two or three families
could share the same television, washing machine, etc. Likewise,
five or six families could make do with only two cars. As God’s
people learn to live simply, and to share what they have, they
will be left with surplus resources. This surplus could be used by
the deacons to minister to people in need.